Corporaticracy

The point I want to discuss is the taking over of the world and it's people, its resources and everything else there exist through control of economy by the privileged few best described by the neology corporaticracy. I won't say that I figured it out myself, there are a lot of documentaries out there that tell you this, but the problem with them is constraint. They tend to not control their ideas and this makes their interpretations incredulous, but yeah we can see that there is some truth in the conspiracy theories. Have you heard of the saying that the biggest deception of the devil is making people doubt his existence.

Well the thing is that the reason a man worked in age of prehistory was to feed himself and perhaps his family. It's the same for animals. They didnt have any comforts of transport, accomodation, entertainment, food, medical care etc but they didnt have to work unless required. Compare this to the modern state of affairs. We are slaves to an invisible entity. This entity is the corporates and the people in control are what I call corporaticracy. These are the people who with limitless wealth generated and power generated wealth are pulling strings of every thing that effect us. We feel that now we are free and live in a democratic world, but none but a 5 year old will believe it to be true. Democracy is just the form of government election we have, but ultimately it is all a big show. The banking system that we have is not something that any independent group of leaders would have let take form. Taking for instance the recent recession/depression, the reason was no doubt the greed of these bankers. The credit market was stretched out and loans given like false cheques (ultimately that's what they turned out to be, given that bankers didn't have to pay for them) and then getting humungous amounts of money from the governments as support to prevent these greedy corporates from falling. True that at the position the economic world is/was the role of these corporates was too important to allow them to be diluted, but the question is why were they even allowed to assume such a role when they clearly lacked the credibility and responsibility that was expected from them. The reason is obvious that the government heads are (if not a marionette in their hands) very much associated with their shady operations. These can of course never be proved though all reason points to this.